沒有會處罰人的神
沒有神會處罰你
神是無條件的愛
無條件就是無條件
任何利用恐懼聲稱：
＊神會處罰你
＊會有報應
＊會下地獄的
都【不是神】
因為不是神
它也沒有資格處罰任何人
#今天指導靈說的話 #沒有報應這件事 #也不用贖罪
我 是 五 次 元 新 地 球 新 人 類
2020年4月17日
【找到核心的負面信念】
每天靜坐時
我都在問覺知
什麼是我最核心的負面信念？
我知道還有我沒發現的
巴夏說問自己
當你成為你最想成為的人時，你最害怕什麼事發生？
我都在問覺知
什麼是我最核心的負面信念？
我知道還有我沒發現的
巴夏說問自己
當你成為你最想成為的人時，你最害怕什麼事發生？
當我半夜看《與神為友》時，太多字要消化有點昏
尼爾害怕推廣一個「不會處罰人的神」會遭到神的處罰
覺得他有點荒唐
放下書之後，突然把這兩者連在一起
腦中冒出很多畫面
小時候各種被大人恐嚇會被神處罰下地獄的觀念
有錢會被懲罰，跳舞也會，太享受也會 ........一大堆
而且每個宗教還不同
然後突然知道了！
尼爾害怕推廣一個「不會處罰人的神」會遭到神的處罰
覺得他有點荒唐
放下書之後，突然把這兩者連在一起
腦中冒出很多畫面
小時候各種被大人恐嚇會被神處罰下地獄的觀念
有錢會被懲罰，跳舞也會，太享受也會 ........一大堆
而且每個宗教還不同
然後突然知道了！
原來當我成為我想成為的人時
我最害怕被神處罰
這正是我最核心的負面信念
而且意識到這有多荒唐
我最害怕被神處罰
這正是我最核心的負面信念
而且意識到這有多荒唐
發現當負面信念快要被覺察前
會感受到身體緊繃與自我的抗拒
一直想自己到底怎麼了
甚至浮出過去陳年的恐懼
但原來跟著的是好事
找到之後身體就鬆開了
身心靈會確實知道找到了
會感受到身體緊繃與自我的抗拒
一直想自己到底怎麼了
甚至浮出過去陳年的恐懼
但原來跟著的是好事
找到之後身體就鬆開了
身心靈會確實知道找到了
理解到原來內在會找各種藉口避開真實渴望
是為了害怕獲得之後會被神處罰
乾脆不要獲得或假裝沒有渴望
而且很多藉口都看起來很光明正面
找到了才發現自欺欺人
找到了可以分享出來
讓更多人檢視自己的負面信念
是為了害怕獲得之後會被神處罰
乾脆不要獲得或假裝沒有渴望
而且很多藉口都看起來很光明正面
找到了才發現自欺欺人
找到了可以分享出來
讓更多人檢視自己的負面信念
找到之後的感覺
居然很像抽水馬桶
塞子打開水順暢流下去的感覺
居然很像抽水馬桶
塞子打開水順暢流下去的感覺
2020年4月16日
【蛋】
歡迎來到這個世界上
也許和你以為的不一樣
也許能看見比你想像中更美好的風景
也許不行
那也沒關係
世界就是世界本來的摸樣
也許和你以為的不一樣
也許能看見比你想像中更美好的風景
也許不行
那也沒關係
世界就是世界本來的摸樣
終有一天你會記起
在你拼了命想讓世界更好
拼了命地付出
卻又陷入失望透頂的狀態之後
在你拼了命想讓世界更好
拼了命地付出
卻又陷入失望透頂的狀態之後
你放棄了更好
只是接受一切
突然間你才看見
真正的世界
然後感覺到
其實你早就知道了
只是接受一切
突然間你才看見
真正的世界
然後感覺到
其實你早就知道了
●售列印輸出明信片單張NT100
負面信念說的才是狗屁
你可以選擇不要去認同它
它最大的恐懼就是你發現它並非事實
負面信念希望你以為只有它是唯一事實
然後你誤以為你沒有其他選擇
你永遠有其他選擇
你永遠是你實相的創造者
2020年4月13日
巴夏Bashar: 關於【生氣和憤怒】
Anger As An Opportunity For Alignment
把生氣和憤怒當做一次校準和融合的機會
---（下文中，Q為互動提問者，B為巴夏）---
Q: I want to talk to you about anger.
我想跟你聊聊生氣和憤怒。
B: Oh, all right.
哦，好啊。
Q: You know how the psychologists say, or the theory is, that you pick
people that are like a mirror for you. Right?
你知道心理學家怎麼談論它嗎？
或者說，那理論是說，你挑選那人，而那人就好像是你的一面鏡子在反射你。這說法對嗎？
B: Yes.
對啊。
Q: Well, I picked this person.
嗯，那麼說，我精挑細選了這傢夥來發火。
B: Yes.
是的。
Q: And it's my girlfriend, and I live with her, and I'm always seeing how
angry I get. And all the time I'm asking myself, “Okay, how is this serving
me? What is there for me to learn that I don't want to look at in myself?”
I try and apply all these things. I ask myself, but I don't know…
可她是我的女友啊，而且我和她共同生活，並且我總是看到我在發火，大發雷霆。
於是我持續不斷的，對我自己說，“好啦，這事帶給我什麼呢？我能從這事上去領悟什麼，
換句話說，總在發火，是我不想在我自己內在裡去審視我自己嗎？”
我盡力專心的去找這些事情的全部答案。我問我自己，但我不能領悟.....
B: May I interrupt you? It is not always a /literal/ reflection. The idea of
individuals you attract into your life that are there to reflect ideas to
you does not always mean that what they are doing is a completely literal
reflection of something /you/ are doing. It simply is an opportunity to
recognize that you may be being of service to them, and they may be being
of service to you, in different ways on different levels. It is not to say
that it has to be a direct “one to one” reflection.
我能打斷你一下嗎？“反射”不一定是完全照字面意思的。
“你吸引到你生活中的個體們”這個概念，是在反射你的想法念頭給你，
並不一定意味著，你正在做什麼是一個完全字面意義上“反射”著你正在做的某些事。
這僅僅是一個機會讓你去認清，在不同的層面上，以不同的路徑方式，
你可能正在服務於他們，並且他們可能也正在服務著你。
那不是說，它只能必須是作為一個單方向的“一對一”的反射。
Q: How do you tell the difference?
那你如何分辨這其中的不同和差別？
B: You simply can understand, as has been expressed, that if you cannot
figure out what a one to one reflection would be, then begin searching all the different levels.
你很容易明白，因為已經被表達展現了，那時如果你沒能找出一對一反射的是什麼，
那你就隨之開始搜索所有的不同層面。
Q: Okay, I see what you're saying, but I just notice that no matter what
the situation is, I wake up in the morning and go, “Okay, I'm going to be more patient and more accepting.”
好的，我明白你正說的所指了，但是我只注意到不管那情形局面是怎樣的，
我在早上醒來並且說，“好啦，我打算更有耐性更能接納。”
B: More patient?
更有耐性？
Q: Yes.
是啊。
B: Patient? Why do you need to be patient?
耐性？為什麼你必須有耐性？
Q: Because I feel like I'm going to be angry.
因為我覺得我好像總是要發火。
B: Do you think that patience is going to relieve any of the strain that you feel?
你認為，那忍耐可以解除你感覺上的緊張嗎？
Q: No, because it doesn't work.
沒，因為它根本沒用。
B: Correct. Understand, you are only impatient because you think you need
patience. Living in the moment and enjoying everything you are in any given
moment makes you enjoy your life far too much to have to be patient.
Patience says that you are not enjoying what you are.
這就對嘍。要弄明白，只因為你容易發火，所以你才認為你必須忍住。
活在你的每一此刻，享受在，你所投入進去的每一件事情，
並且在每一個此刻，讓你自己都沉浸在，對生活的欣賞裡，
要遠遠超過，強調忍耐，似乎生活都變成了必須忍耐。
忍耐在告訴你，你不喜歡“你所是的你”......，
.....對於“你是什麼”，你沒在欣賞和喜愛著。
Q: Well, sometimes I feel that I don't want to enjoy being in an anger mode, because…
好吧，有時候，我感覺，我真不想去沉浸在一個憤怒的發火的狀態，因為.....
B: Nobody says you have to be.
沒人說你必須那樣。
Q: All right, well just let me finish my statement.
好的，嗯，就讓我把我想說的說完，好嗎？
B: Oh, all right!
哦，好的！
Q: Because you see, I feel like it crushes her spirit – because she's an
expression totally different than me. I'm intellectual and intense, and
she's flighty and very mellow. And so it's interesting that this
combination is happening, right? I don't feel like I want to squelch her
expression but I feel like that's what I do, because I'm too intense. It's
like I'm always getting angry at her expression. And I'm trying to learn
about myself, I'm not blaming her, I'm just trying to learn about myself.
你也看到了，我覺得我好像擠壓著她的精神---因為她的情感表達方式跟我完全不同。
我是個刻板的知識分子，愛較真兒又富有熱情，而她反復無常可又溫柔醇美，非常有女人味。
所以，這一對兒能碰巧組合在一起是太有趣了，不是嗎？我不覺得，我想去控制她的表達方式，
但我覺得，事實上一看，我就是在掌控她，因為我太較真兒了，我有自己特別強烈的意見看法。
好像，我總是會對她的表達方式很惱火。所以現在，我正在努力的去審視我自己，我不指責她，
我只是，正在努力去審視我自己，瞭解我自己。
B: Yes. Yes.
對了，對了！
Q: And be a little more like a duck, and let the water go over my feathers.
有點像一隻鴨子，讓水重新清洗我的羽毛。
B: But in this way, being a duck does not mean that you do not stand up
for what you are. Now recognize, in this way, that anger is only judgment
of what is true for you, because you think that what is true for you should
not be true for you, with regard and in comparison to what you think is
true for someone else.
Anger is an alignment, and never needs to be experienced negatively. What
you are used to thinking of as anger never needs to be experienced that
way, if you allow it to be alignment. In other words, you see someone in
your life that you have attracted, and you recognize that their reality is
their reality, and that it is different from yours. And seeing their
reality allows you a stronger alignment with /your/ reality, with what you
know to be true for you. That /alignment/, in of itself, will never produce a
negative feeling. Judgment and resentment of that interaction is what
produces the anger.
You have been given an opportunity by that other individual to see what you
are aligned with, and what is true /for you/.
但是你說的這個方式，一隻鴨子並沒表明，你不站在“你是什麼”的基本信念立場上。
要認清，在你說的這個方式上，憤怒髮火僅僅是評判，有關於對你來說---什麼是“真”，
什麼是“實”的“評判”，因為你所認定的對你來說“什麼是真的，什麼是實體性的”，
對你來說你要認清它們並不是真和實的，用心觀察你認定的真實和其他人相比的不同。
憤怒髮火是一個調校對齊，永遠不必去以“有經驗的老資格”去消極的否定（他人）。
如果你允許它去調整對齊，你習慣視作“憤怒”的概念就永遠不必用那個憤怒的模式被經驗到。
換句話說，在你的生活中你已吸引並看到某個人，並且你認出，他們的現實實相是他們的現實實相，
而且它不同於你的現實實相。於是當你參觀和領會著他們的現實實相，因此賦予你一個更強烈的
調校，使你於你的現實實相對齊成一直線，去校準你所確信的“什麼是真的，實體的”。
那個校準調整，內在它本身，永遠不會產生一個負面的消極的情感感受。
在那個互動和相互影響裡的---審判和不滿，憎惡---才真正產生憤怒。
你已被給予一個良機，通過與其他個體的那些互動，來審視你內在概念想法的匹配是什麼，
並且對你來說--你相信為“真”，為“實體性”的是什麼。
Q: Okay, I feel like this is hitting home. So, a person gives you an opportunity to know where you stand.
好的，我有打中靶心的感覺。所以，一個人帶給你一個好機會去領悟你看問題的立場在哪兒。
B: Yes.
對嘍~~！
Q: And so, say that person leaves the iron on all the time and, for me, I
see how important it is to turn off appliances – that's a simple thing.
因此來說，那個人為了我全天候身披鎧甲，我領悟到關閉我的電源是多重要了---這是個很簡單的事。
(一個人身披鎧甲，一個人火力全開，大戰就這麼開打了。）
B: Yes.
是啊。
Q: Okay. Once you get that, how can I let her expression be hers and know
where I stand without inflicting it on her?
好的。一旦你面對那個情景，我如何能讓她展現她是她自己，並且領悟到我站在哪個立場上才不強加給她？
B: This very simple. Now, do remember that you can always discuss
something without needing the other person to change because you think they
are “less” than your idea. You can discuss it as an equal, in this way, and
simply share your expression of your understanding.
At the same time, recognize that when you are willing to acknowledge that
it is a reflection for you and an opportunity to be a reflection for them
equally, then, if you are “meant” to stay in the situation, you will. If it
is a reflection that you should part, then an opportunity will come alongfor you to part. Do you follow me?part. Do you follow me?
這非常簡單。現在，去切記，你可以總是商量探討某些事情，而不必去改變其他人。
因為你認為他們的觀念想法比你“差遠”了，不如你。
你可以一個平等的心態去探討商量這事情，
這樣，因此只是分享屬於你們各自觀念理解的表達，謀求一致同意。
於此同時，要弄清，當你在心甘情願的樂於去承認，這是一個給你的反射，
同時是一個良機去為他們作一個對等的反射，那時如果你是打算保持在那個情形裡，你會的。
如果它是一個你想岔開的反射，那麼隨後就會有個機會來讓你去岔開。
你跟上了嗎？
Q: So are you saying… like, how I'm trying to work with her now is
seeing – by discussing things after the anger and all of that – is seeing
that her point is just as valid as mine. She's just coming from… she's a
different crystal, right?
那麼你是在說....比如，現在我正如此的努力和她一起工作是因為----
在經歷憤怒之後，對事情的探討商量以及諸如此類的---是因為她的指向是和我同等的，
她的觀念思想是和我同等的正當有效，等值的。
她只是源於....她是一個不同的意識結晶體，對吧？
B: Yes.
是的。
Q: And trying to understand that it's not that I have a better way, or a
more precise way – it's a different way.
於是努力去弄明白去理解，那不是說，我有一個更好的觀點和方式，
或者更正確的，更準確的觀點和方式---而是它根本是平等的，是來自於彼此不同的路徑。
B: Yes. For in this way, you are only making assumptions – although we
understand the idea you are discussing – you are only making assumptions
that what you think is going to be the result of her actions will be true.
And they may not be.
是的。因此這樣一來，你只是在做“ 假設 ”，你只是在“ 假定 ”，“ 想當然 ”----
儘管我們能理解你正在討論的想法--- 你只是在“假設”著，
你“ 認定了你的假設 ”是她的“所做所為”，會導致的結果，並且你相信那結果會是“ 真 ”的。
但他們的結果，也許根本不是你所假設的那樣。
Q: What do you mean?
你的意思是？
B: In other words, many times when you judge another individual, you are
only doing it based upon the assumption that you think that their actions
will lead to certain results – and they don't have to.
In other words, you are being given an opportunity to examine what results
might occur if /you/ took the action you are seeing them take. But not
necessarily an indication of what results will occur just because
/they/ performed the action.
換句話說吧，很多時候當你“ 審判 ”另一個個體的時候，
你僅僅是“ 判定 ”他們的“所作所為”，將會導向某些“ 必然 ”的【負面】結果，這結果你難以接受，
它僅僅是你的【想當然】---它完全是建立在你的【假設】上---
然而他們根本沒那個必然性，事情不一定是你所“假設的” 結果。
再換個說法，你在觀察他們的“所作所為”時，你正被給予一個機會去檢查.....
如果你按照他們的方式去做的話，對你來說可能會出現什麼。
但是這不一定表明，會出現什麼必然的結果，
那只是因為，那是他們的功能，那是他們的能力，
那只是他們在扮演他們的角色，而不是你。
Q: Right, sometimes I think, “God, if I was in her shoes, I would have
been dead twenty years ago.” (AUD: laughter) And for her that may be fine, but for me…
對啊，有時候我想，“天啊，如果我像她那麼活著，我早已經死了20年了。”（現場笑聲一片）
對她來說也許挺不錯啊，但對我來說.....
B: Yes.
是的。
Q: So then anger… okay, sometimes I want to be less angry because I find
that it hurts me to be so angry all the time.
所以說憤怒....好啦，有時我想少發火，因為我發現憤怒，全天候的火兒大，它也傷害了我自己。
B: That is because you judge the alignment. You will always be aligning.
You will always see reflections around you that will give you an
opportunity to align with what you know to be true for you. It is only the
judgment that creates the negative feeling.
那是因為你負面評判了這個“校準對齊”的概念。你會始終在校準對正著。
你會始終看到你周圍的反射，並會帶給你一個良機去調整矯正---你所確信的---“真，實”是什麼。
產生【負面】感受，完全是因為“假設”的，“想當然”的【負面】評判所導致的。
Q: Isn't that where patience comes in?
這裡不需要來點忍耐嗎？
B: No.
不需要。
Q: Well, I mean you've said patience…
好吧，我的意思是說，你剛才說的忍耐.....
B: No. No.
不需要，不需要。
Q: Okay, well, you're aligning and centering yourself…
好的，嗯，你正在調教對齊矯正，並且將自己定在中心點上，居中，平衡....
B: EVERY SINGLE TIME you realize that you are being given an OPPORTUNITY
to align and integrate more and more of yourself, then it is such – at
least from /my/ point of view – an ECSTATIC experience that you do not need
patience. Because patience implies that you are waiting for something
better to come along. But what could be better than the ecstasy that you
are feeling in the moment of alignment?
每一時刻---你要認清，你正被給予一個良機去調校你自己，並且融合更多更多的你自己，
在這一點上，至少從我的視角來說是這樣的，你根本不必忍耐---那會是一個狂喜的體驗。
因為忍耐隱含著你暗示自己，你在等待什麼，你“想當然”的所謂的“好事”出現。
但還有什麼會比，你在那個時刻校準對正自己時，所感受到的狂喜，更好的呢？
Q: Well, do /you/ have anger?
那好吧，你會憤怒髮火嗎？
B: Not in a negative way, WE ALWAYS HAVE ALIGNMENT. But not anger, as you understand it.
不會在一個抵抗性的，抗拒的方式上，我們始終會調校對齊。但不是你所理解的那個憤怒。
Q: Well… my alignment is expressed in a negative way.
那.....我的調校對齊是被在一個反抗性，抗拒的方式上被展現了。
B: That is because you are judging your alignment. Now, if you do not
PREFER to have it expressed in a negative way, you don't have to. You can
simply take it as the JOY and ECSTASY of being given the opportunity to
align and, therefore, RADIATE BACK your point of view, without judgment,
upon the other individual: JUST YOUR POINT OF VIEW.
那是因為你正在【負面】審判著你自己的調校對齊。
現在，如果你不喜歡以一個反抗，抗拒性的方式去展現它，你不必那麼做。
你可以單純的把它當做，被給予良機去調校對齊所帶來的快樂享受和狂喜，
所以，你的視角觀點輻射回來，
它沒有居高臨下對其他個體的審判：僅僅作為你個人觀點和視角。
Q: I'll try that. That's great, thank you. I mean… I know I said “try,” but it's…
我會努力這麼做。這真棒，謝謝你。
我意思....我明白我說“努力”的信念是負面的，但我不知道用什麼詞兒....
B: It is all right. We understand. Thank you.
沒關係，我們明白你的真正意思，謝謝你。
Q: Thanks.
謝謝。
————————————————————————————————————
版權所有：Bashar Channeled by Darryl Anka 巴夏經由達裏爾安卡傳送
原文出處：http://robertjrgraham.com/2010/11/15/anger-as-an-opportunity-for-alignment/
翻譯整理：冷靜投機（歡迎指正翻譯錯誤）http://blog.sina.com.cn/mymoneybag
* * * 附錄名詞解釋 * * *
Anger 憤怒，發怒，生氣
1. a strong emotion; a feeling that is oriented toward some real or supposed grievance
一個強烈的情緒；由於認定某個“現實或假想”的事物真實存在，而對該事物不滿，不平委屈而引發的一種感受
2. belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong
認定某個“現實或假想”的事物真實存在，並有錯誤或過失，而激發抗拒和爭鬥
（文字只用於閱讀分享，請勿用作它途）
把生氣和憤怒當做一次校準和融合的機會
---（下文中，Q為互動提問者，B為巴夏）---
Q: I want to talk to you about anger.
我想跟你聊聊生氣和憤怒。
B: Oh, all right.
哦，好啊。
Q: You know how the psychologists say, or the theory is, that you pick
people that are like a mirror for you. Right?
你知道心理學家怎麼談論它嗎？
或者說，那理論是說，你挑選那人，而那人就好像是你的一面鏡子在反射你。這說法對嗎？
B: Yes.
對啊。
Q: Well, I picked this person.
嗯，那麼說，我精挑細選了這傢夥來發火。
B: Yes.
是的。
Q: And it's my girlfriend, and I live with her, and I'm always seeing how
angry I get. And all the time I'm asking myself, “Okay, how is this serving
me? What is there for me to learn that I don't want to look at in myself?”
I try and apply all these things. I ask myself, but I don't know…
可她是我的女友啊，而且我和她共同生活，並且我總是看到我在發火，大發雷霆。
於是我持續不斷的，對我自己說，“好啦，這事帶給我什麼呢？我能從這事上去領悟什麼，
換句話說，總在發火，是我不想在我自己內在裡去審視我自己嗎？”
我盡力專心的去找這些事情的全部答案。我問我自己，但我不能領悟.....
B: May I interrupt you? It is not always a /literal/ reflection. The idea of
individuals you attract into your life that are there to reflect ideas to
you does not always mean that what they are doing is a completely literal
reflection of something /you/ are doing. It simply is an opportunity to
recognize that you may be being of service to them, and they may be being
of service to you, in different ways on different levels. It is not to say
that it has to be a direct “one to one” reflection.
我能打斷你一下嗎？“反射”不一定是完全照字面意思的。
“你吸引到你生活中的個體們”這個概念，是在反射你的想法念頭給你，
並不一定意味著，你正在做什麼是一個完全字面意義上“反射”著你正在做的某些事。
這僅僅是一個機會讓你去認清，在不同的層面上，以不同的路徑方式，
你可能正在服務於他們，並且他們可能也正在服務著你。
那不是說，它只能必須是作為一個單方向的“一對一”的反射。
Q: How do you tell the difference?
那你如何分辨這其中的不同和差別？
B: You simply can understand, as has been expressed, that if you cannot
figure out what a one to one reflection would be, then begin searching all the different levels.
你很容易明白，因為已經被表達展現了，那時如果你沒能找出一對一反射的是什麼，
那你就隨之開始搜索所有的不同層面。
Q: Okay, I see what you're saying, but I just notice that no matter what
the situation is, I wake up in the morning and go, “Okay, I'm going to be more patient and more accepting.”
好的，我明白你正說的所指了，但是我只注意到不管那情形局面是怎樣的，
我在早上醒來並且說，“好啦，我打算更有耐性更能接納。”
B: More patient?
更有耐性？
Q: Yes.
是啊。
B: Patient? Why do you need to be patient?
耐性？為什麼你必須有耐性？
Q: Because I feel like I'm going to be angry.
因為我覺得我好像總是要發火。
B: Do you think that patience is going to relieve any of the strain that you feel?
你認為，那忍耐可以解除你感覺上的緊張嗎？
Q: No, because it doesn't work.
沒，因為它根本沒用。
B: Correct. Understand, you are only impatient because you think you need
patience. Living in the moment and enjoying everything you are in any given
moment makes you enjoy your life far too much to have to be patient.
Patience says that you are not enjoying what you are.
這就對嘍。要弄明白，只因為你容易發火，所以你才認為你必須忍住。
活在你的每一此刻，享受在，你所投入進去的每一件事情，
並且在每一個此刻，讓你自己都沉浸在，對生活的欣賞裡，
要遠遠超過，強調忍耐，似乎生活都變成了必須忍耐。
忍耐在告訴你，你不喜歡“你所是的你”......，
.....對於“你是什麼”，你沒在欣賞和喜愛著。
Q: Well, sometimes I feel that I don't want to enjoy being in an anger mode, because…
好吧，有時候，我感覺，我真不想去沉浸在一個憤怒的發火的狀態，因為.....
B: Nobody says you have to be.
沒人說你必須那樣。
Q: All right, well just let me finish my statement.
好的，嗯，就讓我把我想說的說完，好嗎？
B: Oh, all right!
哦，好的！
Q: Because you see, I feel like it crushes her spirit – because she's an
expression totally different than me. I'm intellectual and intense, and
she's flighty and very mellow. And so it's interesting that this
combination is happening, right? I don't feel like I want to squelch her
expression but I feel like that's what I do, because I'm too intense. It's
like I'm always getting angry at her expression. And I'm trying to learn
about myself, I'm not blaming her, I'm just trying to learn about myself.
你也看到了，我覺得我好像擠壓著她的精神---因為她的情感表達方式跟我完全不同。
我是個刻板的知識分子，愛較真兒又富有熱情，而她反復無常可又溫柔醇美，非常有女人味。
所以，這一對兒能碰巧組合在一起是太有趣了，不是嗎？我不覺得，我想去控制她的表達方式，
但我覺得，事實上一看，我就是在掌控她，因為我太較真兒了，我有自己特別強烈的意見看法。
好像，我總是會對她的表達方式很惱火。所以現在，我正在努力的去審視我自己，我不指責她，
我只是，正在努力去審視我自己，瞭解我自己。
B: Yes. Yes.
對了，對了！
Q: And be a little more like a duck, and let the water go over my feathers.
有點像一隻鴨子，讓水重新清洗我的羽毛。
B: But in this way, being a duck does not mean that you do not stand up
for what you are. Now recognize, in this way, that anger is only judgment
of what is true for you, because you think that what is true for you should
not be true for you, with regard and in comparison to what you think is
true for someone else.
Anger is an alignment, and never needs to be experienced negatively. What
you are used to thinking of as anger never needs to be experienced that
way, if you allow it to be alignment. In other words, you see someone in
your life that you have attracted, and you recognize that their reality is
their reality, and that it is different from yours. And seeing their
reality allows you a stronger alignment with /your/ reality, with what you
know to be true for you. That /alignment/, in of itself, will never produce a
negative feeling. Judgment and resentment of that interaction is what
produces the anger.
You have been given an opportunity by that other individual to see what you
are aligned with, and what is true /for you/.
但是你說的這個方式，一隻鴨子並沒表明，你不站在“你是什麼”的基本信念立場上。
要認清，在你說的這個方式上，憤怒髮火僅僅是評判，有關於對你來說---什麼是“真”，
什麼是“實”的“評判”，因為你所認定的對你來說“什麼是真的，什麼是實體性的”，
對你來說你要認清它們並不是真和實的，用心觀察你認定的真實和其他人相比的不同。
憤怒髮火是一個調校對齊，永遠不必去以“有經驗的老資格”去消極的否定（他人）。
如果你允許它去調整對齊，你習慣視作“憤怒”的概念就永遠不必用那個憤怒的模式被經驗到。
換句話說，在你的生活中你已吸引並看到某個人，並且你認出，他們的現實實相是他們的現實實相，
而且它不同於你的現實實相。於是當你參觀和領會著他們的現實實相，因此賦予你一個更強烈的
調校，使你於你的現實實相對齊成一直線，去校準你所確信的“什麼是真的，實體的”。
那個校準調整，內在它本身，永遠不會產生一個負面的消極的情感感受。
在那個互動和相互影響裡的---審判和不滿，憎惡---才真正產生憤怒。
你已被給予一個良機，通過與其他個體的那些互動，來審視你內在概念想法的匹配是什麼，
並且對你來說--你相信為“真”，為“實體性”的是什麼。
Q: Okay, I feel like this is hitting home. So, a person gives you an opportunity to know where you stand.
好的，我有打中靶心的感覺。所以，一個人帶給你一個好機會去領悟你看問題的立場在哪兒。
B: Yes.
對嘍~~！
Q: And so, say that person leaves the iron on all the time and, for me, I
see how important it is to turn off appliances – that's a simple thing.
因此來說，那個人為了我全天候身披鎧甲，我領悟到關閉我的電源是多重要了---這是個很簡單的事。
(一個人身披鎧甲，一個人火力全開，大戰就這麼開打了。）
B: Yes.
是啊。
Q: Okay. Once you get that, how can I let her expression be hers and know
where I stand without inflicting it on her?
好的。一旦你面對那個情景，我如何能讓她展現她是她自己，並且領悟到我站在哪個立場上才不強加給她？
B: This very simple. Now, do remember that you can always discuss
something without needing the other person to change because you think they
are “less” than your idea. You can discuss it as an equal, in this way, and
simply share your expression of your understanding.
At the same time, recognize that when you are willing to acknowledge that
it is a reflection for you and an opportunity to be a reflection for them
equally, then, if you are “meant” to stay in the situation, you will. If it
is a reflection that you should part, then an opportunity will come alongfor you to part. Do you follow me?part. Do you follow me?
這非常簡單。現在，去切記，你可以總是商量探討某些事情，而不必去改變其他人。
因為你認為他們的觀念想法比你“差遠”了，不如你。
你可以一個平等的心態去探討商量這事情，
這樣，因此只是分享屬於你們各自觀念理解的表達，謀求一致同意。
於此同時，要弄清，當你在心甘情願的樂於去承認，這是一個給你的反射，
同時是一個良機去為他們作一個對等的反射，那時如果你是打算保持在那個情形裡，你會的。
如果它是一個你想岔開的反射，那麼隨後就會有個機會來讓你去岔開。
你跟上了嗎？
Q: So are you saying… like, how I'm trying to work with her now is
seeing – by discussing things after the anger and all of that – is seeing
that her point is just as valid as mine. She's just coming from… she's a
different crystal, right?
那麼你是在說....比如，現在我正如此的努力和她一起工作是因為----
在經歷憤怒之後，對事情的探討商量以及諸如此類的---是因為她的指向是和我同等的，
她的觀念思想是和我同等的正當有效，等值的。
她只是源於....她是一個不同的意識結晶體，對吧？
B: Yes.
是的。
Q: And trying to understand that it's not that I have a better way, or a
more precise way – it's a different way.
於是努力去弄明白去理解，那不是說，我有一個更好的觀點和方式，
或者更正確的，更準確的觀點和方式---而是它根本是平等的，是來自於彼此不同的路徑。
B: Yes. For in this way, you are only making assumptions – although we
understand the idea you are discussing – you are only making assumptions
that what you think is going to be the result of her actions will be true.
And they may not be.
是的。因此這樣一來，你只是在做“ 假設 ”，你只是在“ 假定 ”，“ 想當然 ”----
儘管我們能理解你正在討論的想法--- 你只是在“假設”著，
你“ 認定了你的假設 ”是她的“所做所為”，會導致的結果，並且你相信那結果會是“ 真 ”的。
但他們的結果，也許根本不是你所假設的那樣。
Q: What do you mean?
你的意思是？
B: In other words, many times when you judge another individual, you are
only doing it based upon the assumption that you think that their actions
will lead to certain results – and they don't have to.
In other words, you are being given an opportunity to examine what results
might occur if /you/ took the action you are seeing them take. But not
necessarily an indication of what results will occur just because
/they/ performed the action.
換句話說吧，很多時候當你“ 審判 ”另一個個體的時候，
你僅僅是“ 判定 ”他們的“所作所為”，將會導向某些“ 必然 ”的【負面】結果，這結果你難以接受，
它僅僅是你的【想當然】---它完全是建立在你的【假設】上---
然而他們根本沒那個必然性，事情不一定是你所“假設的” 結果。
再換個說法，你在觀察他們的“所作所為”時，你正被給予一個機會去檢查.....
如果你按照他們的方式去做的話，對你來說可能會出現什麼。
但是這不一定表明，會出現什麼必然的結果，
那只是因為，那是他們的功能，那是他們的能力，
那只是他們在扮演他們的角色，而不是你。
Q: Right, sometimes I think, “God, if I was in her shoes, I would have
been dead twenty years ago.” (AUD: laughter) And for her that may be fine, but for me…
對啊，有時候我想，“天啊，如果我像她那麼活著，我早已經死了20年了。”（現場笑聲一片）
對她來說也許挺不錯啊，但對我來說.....
B: Yes.
是的。
Q: So then anger… okay, sometimes I want to be less angry because I find
that it hurts me to be so angry all the time.
所以說憤怒....好啦，有時我想少發火，因為我發現憤怒，全天候的火兒大，它也傷害了我自己。
B: That is because you judge the alignment. You will always be aligning.
You will always see reflections around you that will give you an
opportunity to align with what you know to be true for you. It is only the
judgment that creates the negative feeling.
那是因為你負面評判了這個“校準對齊”的概念。你會始終在校準對正著。
你會始終看到你周圍的反射，並會帶給你一個良機去調整矯正---你所確信的---“真，實”是什麼。
產生【負面】感受，完全是因為“假設”的，“想當然”的【負面】評判所導致的。
Q: Isn't that where patience comes in?
這裡不需要來點忍耐嗎？
B: No.
不需要。
Q: Well, I mean you've said patience…
好吧，我的意思是說，你剛才說的忍耐.....
B: No. No.
不需要，不需要。
Q: Okay, well, you're aligning and centering yourself…
好的，嗯，你正在調教對齊矯正，並且將自己定在中心點上，居中，平衡....
B: EVERY SINGLE TIME you realize that you are being given an OPPORTUNITY
to align and integrate more and more of yourself, then it is such – at
least from /my/ point of view – an ECSTATIC experience that you do not need
patience. Because patience implies that you are waiting for something
better to come along. But what could be better than the ecstasy that you
are feeling in the moment of alignment?
每一時刻---你要認清，你正被給予一個良機去調校你自己，並且融合更多更多的你自己，
在這一點上，至少從我的視角來說是這樣的，你根本不必忍耐---那會是一個狂喜的體驗。
因為忍耐隱含著你暗示自己，你在等待什麼，你“想當然”的所謂的“好事”出現。
但還有什麼會比，你在那個時刻校準對正自己時，所感受到的狂喜，更好的呢？
Q: Well, do /you/ have anger?
那好吧，你會憤怒髮火嗎？
B: Not in a negative way, WE ALWAYS HAVE ALIGNMENT. But not anger, as you understand it.
不會在一個抵抗性的，抗拒的方式上，我們始終會調校對齊。但不是你所理解的那個憤怒。
Q: Well… my alignment is expressed in a negative way.
那.....我的調校對齊是被在一個反抗性，抗拒的方式上被展現了。
B: That is because you are judging your alignment. Now, if you do not
PREFER to have it expressed in a negative way, you don't have to. You can
simply take it as the JOY and ECSTASY of being given the opportunity to
align and, therefore, RADIATE BACK your point of view, without judgment,
upon the other individual: JUST YOUR POINT OF VIEW.
那是因為你正在【負面】審判著你自己的調校對齊。
現在，如果你不喜歡以一個反抗，抗拒性的方式去展現它，你不必那麼做。
你可以單純的把它當做，被給予良機去調校對齊所帶來的快樂享受和狂喜，
所以，你的視角觀點輻射回來，
它沒有居高臨下對其他個體的審判：僅僅作為你個人觀點和視角。
Q: I'll try that. That's great, thank you. I mean… I know I said “try,” but it's…
我會努力這麼做。這真棒，謝謝你。
我意思....我明白我說“努力”的信念是負面的，但我不知道用什麼詞兒....
B: It is all right. We understand. Thank you.
沒關係，我們明白你的真正意思，謝謝你。
Q: Thanks.
謝謝。
————————————————————————————————————
版權所有：Bashar Channeled by Darryl Anka 巴夏經由達裏爾安卡傳送
原文出處：http://robertjrgraham.com/2010/11/15/anger-as-an-opportunity-for-alignment/
翻譯整理：冷靜投機（歡迎指正翻譯錯誤）http://blog.sina.com.cn/mymoneybag
* * * 附錄名詞解釋 * * *
Anger 憤怒，發怒，生氣
1. a strong emotion; a feeling that is oriented toward some real or supposed grievance
一個強烈的情緒；由於認定某個“現實或假想”的事物真實存在，而對該事物不滿，不平委屈而引發的一種感受
2. belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong
認定某個“現實或假想”的事物真實存在，並有錯誤或過失，而激發抗拒和爭鬥
（文字只用於閱讀分享，請勿用作它途）
新】【巴夏】20180322譯《憤怒的本質 與 化解的兩種方法》
文章轉載來源：
http://russ999.pixnet.net/blog/post/161080038
問：
Good day, Bashar
日安，巴夏！
巴夏：
And to you, good day
你好，日安！
問：
So good to connect to you in this way, thank you.
能夠以這種方式與你連接，真是太棒了！謝謝你！
巴夏：
You're welcome
不客氣！
問：
I want to discuss one of our darker expression, one of our demons
我想討論我們意識中的一個黑暗面，我們的惡魔之一
巴夏：
How exciting
多麽令人興奮哈！
問：
Yes
是的！
I want to talk a little about anger
我想談一談“憤怒”
which can give way to aggression and violence that we have in our culture
在我們的文化中，憤怒，會導致侵略和暴力
巴夏：
Yes
是的
Although, what we might call natural anger only lasts about 15 seconds.
然而，我們所說的“自然的憤怒”，大約只持續15秒
Beyond that, it's self judgment
超過15秒的話，那就是“自我評判”了
That's the kind of anger you're actually talking about
這才是你所談論的那種“憤怒”
That cause of the difficulties
正是這種憤怒，才會導致苦難
問：
Right
說得對！
巴夏：
But let's also use a new term here
但現在，讓我們用一個新的詞語來描述它
Because the idea of what we are referring to as natural anger is really just resonance alignment
因為我們所指的“自然的憤怒”是指“共振的校調”
When you experience something or are exposed to something
也就是：當你經歷的一些事情，或面對的一些事物
that you really are vibrational incompatible with, that you do not resonate to
你的振動與它們的振動不相兼容，你沒法與它們和諧共處（共振/共鳴）
You will feel that resonant reflection,
你就會感受到這種“共振的反射”
And you will say ”I am aligned with this” or “I am not.
你會說：“我和這個反射的振動，一致呢？還是不一致？”
And in that moment, that's all you need to know
在那個當下，這是你需要知道的全部
And that last about 15 seconds.
而這也只持續15秒左右
Anything beyond that, you usually then get into all sorts of belief systems and value judgments and all sorts of other things
超過這段時間的話，通常說明：你陷入了各種各樣的信念系統，或價值評判，或其他諸如此類的東西
Which is something else completely different
如果這樣的話，就另當別論了
But go on to say what you're going to say, and then I will tell you something also that is very powerful with respect to this so-called emotion of anger or resonance alignment
但請你先繼續說你想說的，然後我再告訴你一些關於這個所謂的“憤怒情緒”或“共振的校調”的另一個也是非常強大的東西
問：
Yeah,
好的
I think what I want to know is
我想知道的是：
Is there something that we can learn on our kind of transmission into a more evolved being
在我們向更進化了的存在體的轉化過程中，我們能夠通過憤怒，學到什麽東西？
And you're further along on that path
畢竟，你們在這條路上走得比我們遠
And I guess I want to know if your culture experiences anger if you guys experience or express violence or aggression
我想知道，在你們的文化中，你們是否也會體驗到憤怒？你們是否也會體驗到，或者表現出暴力或侵略行為呢？
And if you do or even if you don't
如果你們也這樣，或者，你們不一樣
How did you move through that
那你們是怎麽走過來的？
And what can we learn from that
我們能從中學到什麽？
so that in this transition we can have a more evolved or constructive way of dealing with that kind of resonance, that energy that we tend to express violently and destructively, at least at this time
這樣的話，至少在現階段的轉化過程中，我們能夠以一種更為進化的，或更具有建設性的方式，來處理這種共振、這股能量，而不是傾向於用暴力或破壞來表達
巴夏：
I am angry that you asked
你這麽問，讓我很生氣！
問：
Alright, so you do feel it
這麽說，你確實會感到憤怒啦？
巴夏：
No! No! No! I'm kidding
不！不！不！我跟你開玩笑的！
No, we do not experience the idea that you call anger in the way that you mean it, no
不！我們並不會體驗到你所說的那種“憤怒”
We experience resonant alignment, yes
但是，是的！我們確實會體驗到“共振的校調”
However.
然而
Let us introduce a new idea first and foremost, before we go on
在我們繼續之前，請先讓我介紹一種新的理念
There is a phrase that exists in your storytelling structure
在你們“講故事的結構”中，有一個習慣用語
That is actually representative of an emotion, even though most of you don't think of it as such
這個習慣用語，其實代表著一種情緒，雖然你們中的大部分人都不這麽認為
The idea of this resonance alignment
關於“共振的校調”
When you see something that is vibrationally incompatible
當你面對一些振動上“水火不容”的事物時
When there is some kind of resonance there
當出現一些不協調的共振（反射）時
That you say “I wish to do something about this. “
你們會說：“對於這種情況，我希望做點什麽事情”
It's called “a call to action”
這稱之為“對行動召喚”（英雄）
Do you understand?
你明白嗎？
問：
Yes
是的！
巴夏：
It's not a judgment. It's not a value judgment,
這不是評判，不是一個價值的評判。
But it's a recognition that something must be acted on in order to express the idea of the alignment that you feel in contrast or comparison to the misalignment you perceive
而是你在比較了“外在感知到的不一致”和“內在感受到的一致”後，你認識到，有些事情你必須去做，才能表達你內在感受到的“一致性”
And that emotion, that natural resonant realignment or comparison,
這種情緒，這種自然共振的重新校調或比較
rather than actually being referred to now as natural anger that last 15 seconds
已不再把它稱為持續15秒的“自然的憤怒”
is actually capable of being described as what might be called a new emotional label.
而是可以用“新的情緒標簽”來描述它
A new emotional definition
是一種對情緒的新定義
And that new emotion is a call to action
而這種新的情緒，就是對行動的召喚
Do you understand?
你明白了嗎？
問：
Yeah, I like that. I feel that
明白！我喜歡你這種說法，我也能感覺得到。
巴夏：
Alright
好的！
Here's something else that's a very, very, very powerful tool
這是另一個非常非常強大（化解憤怒）的工具
You have a word for it
你們用一個詞來表述它
But many of you don't actually understand what it is
但你們中的很多人，都沒明白它的真正意思
Forgiveness.
寬恕
You follow me?
你明白嗎？
問：
Yes
是的
巴夏：
What is forgiveness?
什麽是“寬恕”呢？
I'll tell you, thank you
讓我來告訴你吧，謝謝！
This is what forgiveness as a state of being is actually vibrationally mechanically doing
從振動的運作機制上看，“寬恕”這種存在的狀態，做了以下事情
When you go into a state of forgiveness
當你進入“寬恕”的狀態
You are forgiving yourself
你就是在寬恕自己
You are forgiving others
你就是在寬恕他人
Yes?
是不是這樣呢？
問：
Yes
是的
巴夏：
It actually is a vibration that has the ability to actually neutralize the negative consequences of a negative choice someone may have made
寬恕的振動，能夠抵消（中和）某個人的負面選擇所帶來的負面結果
Do you understand?
你明白嗎？
問：
Yes
明白
巴夏：
All right.
好的
You know that everything you choose to do will have in physical reality, some form of consequence, some form of outcome
你也知道，你選擇做的每件事情，都會在物質世界中形成某種結果，帶來某種後果
Even in what you call the afterlife
即使在你們所謂的“死後”
You've heard the term, the life review.
你也聽說過“人生回顧”這個詞
問：
Yes
是的
巴夏：
You will look back at your life
在你死後，你會回顧你的這一生
And you will experience all of the consequences of the choices you made from the point of view of anyone who was ever in any way shape or form, choosing to be affected by anything that you did
你會從每一個曾經選擇被你的行為影響的人的角度，去體驗你的每個選擇帶給他們的所有結果
As if you were them
就好像，你就是他們一樣
Do you understand?
你明白嗎？
問：
Yes
明白
巴夏：
Now forgiveness of self and forgiveness of others can actually neutralize the experience of a consequence generated through a negative act
而自我寬恕和寬恕他人，能夠抵消負面行為帶來的影響，免除你們負面結果的經歷
So that even in physical life
所以，即使在物質生活中
And even in the life review
甚至在死後的人生回顧中
If that get canceled out by forgiveness
如果這些負面被“寬恕”消除了
The person will not have to experience the consequence of a choice they made that might have had a negative consequence.
那麽，這個人就不一定需要經歷他的某些選擇所可能產生的負面結果
This is the actual interpretation and meaning when people in religious contexts say that “a being like Jesus took away your sins”
這就是某些宗教人士說的：像耶穌那樣的人“能夠赦免你的罪”的準確解讀和真正意思
It means
它的意思是：
when that being said:” Father, forgive them. They know not what they do. “
當耶穌說：“父啊！寬恕他們吧！因為他們不知道自己做的是什麽”
He was offering you the vibrational teaching that forgiveness can actually neutralize the consequence of a negative choice
耶穌給予你們的是“振動式教導”，讓你們明白：寬恕能夠抵消（無效化）負面選擇所帶來的結果
So that you wouldn't have to experience what it was the people of the time were doing to him as a negative act
這樣你們就不需要經歷那時的人們對他做的負面行為，而產生的負面結果
He forgave you all for all time.
他永遠地寬恕了你們所有人
Do you understand?
你明白了嗎？
問：
Yes
是的
巴夏：
That has a profound affect of allowing you to be free to forgive yourselves and others and come back into alignment.
這對於你們能夠自由地寬恕自己和他人，並且回到與真我一致的狀態，具有深遠的影響
This is where we began our understanding and practice of neutrality for any kind of consequence of a choice that might have been negative in our ancient past
這也是我們理解和練習“中立”的開始之時（耶穌之死），並消除我們族人在過往中的負面選擇所產生的任何一種結果
http://russ999.pixnet.net/blog/post/161080038
問：
Good day, Bashar
日安，巴夏！
巴夏：
And to you, good day
你好，日安！
問：
So good to connect to you in this way, thank you.
能夠以這種方式與你連接，真是太棒了！謝謝你！
巴夏：
You're welcome
不客氣！
問：
I want to discuss one of our darker expression, one of our demons
我想討論我們意識中的一個黑暗面，我們的惡魔之一
巴夏：
How exciting
多麽令人興奮哈！
問：
Yes
是的！
I want to talk a little about anger
我想談一談“憤怒”
which can give way to aggression and violence that we have in our culture
在我們的文化中，憤怒，會導致侵略和暴力
巴夏：
Yes
是的
Although, what we might call natural anger only lasts about 15 seconds.
然而，我們所說的“自然的憤怒”，大約只持續15秒
Beyond that, it's self judgment
超過15秒的話，那就是“自我評判”了
That's the kind of anger you're actually talking about
這才是你所談論的那種“憤怒”
That cause of the difficulties
正是這種憤怒，才會導致苦難
問：
Right
說得對！
巴夏：
But let's also use a new term here
但現在，讓我們用一個新的詞語來描述它
Because the idea of what we are referring to as natural anger is really just resonance alignment
因為我們所指的“自然的憤怒”是指“共振的校調”
When you experience something or are exposed to something
也就是：當你經歷的一些事情，或面對的一些事物
that you really are vibrational incompatible with, that you do not resonate to
你的振動與它們的振動不相兼容，你沒法與它們和諧共處（共振/共鳴）
You will feel that resonant reflection,
你就會感受到這種“共振的反射”
And you will say ”I am aligned with this” or “I am not.
你會說：“我和這個反射的振動，一致呢？還是不一致？”
And in that moment, that's all you need to know
在那個當下，這是你需要知道的全部
And that last about 15 seconds.
而這也只持續15秒左右
Anything beyond that, you usually then get into all sorts of belief systems and value judgments and all sorts of other things
超過這段時間的話，通常說明：你陷入了各種各樣的信念系統，或價值評判，或其他諸如此類的東西
Which is something else completely different
如果這樣的話，就另當別論了
But go on to say what you're going to say, and then I will tell you something also that is very powerful with respect to this so-called emotion of anger or resonance alignment
但請你先繼續說你想說的，然後我再告訴你一些關於這個所謂的“憤怒情緒”或“共振的校調”的另一個也是非常強大的東西
問：
Yeah,
好的
I think what I want to know is
我想知道的是：
Is there something that we can learn on our kind of transmission into a more evolved being
在我們向更進化了的存在體的轉化過程中，我們能夠通過憤怒，學到什麽東西？
And you're further along on that path
畢竟，你們在這條路上走得比我們遠
And I guess I want to know if your culture experiences anger if you guys experience or express violence or aggression
我想知道，在你們的文化中，你們是否也會體驗到憤怒？你們是否也會體驗到，或者表現出暴力或侵略行為呢？
And if you do or even if you don't
如果你們也這樣，或者，你們不一樣
How did you move through that
那你們是怎麽走過來的？
And what can we learn from that
我們能從中學到什麽？
so that in this transition we can have a more evolved or constructive way of dealing with that kind of resonance, that energy that we tend to express violently and destructively, at least at this time
這樣的話，至少在現階段的轉化過程中，我們能夠以一種更為進化的，或更具有建設性的方式，來處理這種共振、這股能量，而不是傾向於用暴力或破壞來表達
巴夏：
I am angry that you asked
你這麽問，讓我很生氣！
問：
Alright, so you do feel it
這麽說，你確實會感到憤怒啦？
巴夏：
No! No! No! I'm kidding
不！不！不！我跟你開玩笑的！
No, we do not experience the idea that you call anger in the way that you mean it, no
不！我們並不會體驗到你所說的那種“憤怒”
We experience resonant alignment, yes
但是，是的！我們確實會體驗到“共振的校調”
However.
然而
Let us introduce a new idea first and foremost, before we go on
在我們繼續之前，請先讓我介紹一種新的理念
There is a phrase that exists in your storytelling structure
在你們“講故事的結構”中，有一個習慣用語
That is actually representative of an emotion, even though most of you don't think of it as such
這個習慣用語，其實代表著一種情緒，雖然你們中的大部分人都不這麽認為
The idea of this resonance alignment
關於“共振的校調”
When you see something that is vibrationally incompatible
當你面對一些振動上“水火不容”的事物時
When there is some kind of resonance there
當出現一些不協調的共振（反射）時
That you say “I wish to do something about this. “
你們會說：“對於這種情況，我希望做點什麽事情”
It's called “a call to action”
這稱之為“對行動召喚”（英雄）
Do you understand?
你明白嗎？
問：
Yes
是的！
巴夏：
It's not a judgment. It's not a value judgment,
這不是評判，不是一個價值的評判。
But it's a recognition that something must be acted on in order to express the idea of the alignment that you feel in contrast or comparison to the misalignment you perceive
而是你在比較了“外在感知到的不一致”和“內在感受到的一致”後，你認識到，有些事情你必須去做，才能表達你內在感受到的“一致性”
And that emotion, that natural resonant realignment or comparison,
這種情緒，這種自然共振的重新校調或比較
rather than actually being referred to now as natural anger that last 15 seconds
已不再把它稱為持續15秒的“自然的憤怒”
is actually capable of being described as what might be called a new emotional label.
而是可以用“新的情緒標簽”來描述它
A new emotional definition
是一種對情緒的新定義
And that new emotion is a call to action
而這種新的情緒，就是對行動的召喚
Do you understand?
你明白了嗎？
問：
Yeah, I like that. I feel that
明白！我喜歡你這種說法，我也能感覺得到。
巴夏：
Alright
好的！
Here's something else that's a very, very, very powerful tool
這是另一個非常非常強大（化解憤怒）的工具
You have a word for it
你們用一個詞來表述它
But many of you don't actually understand what it is
但你們中的很多人，都沒明白它的真正意思
Forgiveness.
寬恕
You follow me?
你明白嗎？
問：
Yes
是的
巴夏：
What is forgiveness?
什麽是“寬恕”呢？
I'll tell you, thank you
讓我來告訴你吧，謝謝！
This is what forgiveness as a state of being is actually vibrationally mechanically doing
從振動的運作機制上看，“寬恕”這種存在的狀態，做了以下事情
When you go into a state of forgiveness
當你進入“寬恕”的狀態
You are forgiving yourself
你就是在寬恕自己
You are forgiving others
你就是在寬恕他人
Yes?
是不是這樣呢？
問：
Yes
是的
巴夏：
It actually is a vibration that has the ability to actually neutralize the negative consequences of a negative choice someone may have made
寬恕的振動，能夠抵消（中和）某個人的負面選擇所帶來的負面結果
Do you understand?
你明白嗎？
問：
Yes
明白
巴夏：
All right.
好的
You know that everything you choose to do will have in physical reality, some form of consequence, some form of outcome
你也知道，你選擇做的每件事情，都會在物質世界中形成某種結果，帶來某種後果
Even in what you call the afterlife
即使在你們所謂的“死後”
You've heard the term, the life review.
你也聽說過“人生回顧”這個詞
問：
Yes
是的
巴夏：
You will look back at your life
在你死後，你會回顧你的這一生
And you will experience all of the consequences of the choices you made from the point of view of anyone who was ever in any way shape or form, choosing to be affected by anything that you did
你會從每一個曾經選擇被你的行為影響的人的角度，去體驗你的每個選擇帶給他們的所有結果
As if you were them
就好像，你就是他們一樣
Do you understand?
你明白嗎？
問：
Yes
明白
巴夏：
Now forgiveness of self and forgiveness of others can actually neutralize the experience of a consequence generated through a negative act
而自我寬恕和寬恕他人，能夠抵消負面行為帶來的影響，免除你們負面結果的經歷
So that even in physical life
所以，即使在物質生活中
And even in the life review
甚至在死後的人生回顧中
If that get canceled out by forgiveness
如果這些負面被“寬恕”消除了
The person will not have to experience the consequence of a choice they made that might have had a negative consequence.
那麽，這個人就不一定需要經歷他的某些選擇所可能產生的負面結果
This is the actual interpretation and meaning when people in religious contexts say that “a being like Jesus took away your sins”
這就是某些宗教人士說的：像耶穌那樣的人“能夠赦免你的罪”的準確解讀和真正意思
It means
它的意思是：
when that being said:” Father, forgive them. They know not what they do. “
當耶穌說：“父啊！寬恕他們吧！因為他們不知道自己做的是什麽”
He was offering you the vibrational teaching that forgiveness can actually neutralize the consequence of a negative choice
耶穌給予你們的是“振動式教導”，讓你們明白：寬恕能夠抵消（無效化）負面選擇所帶來的結果
So that you wouldn't have to experience what it was the people of the time were doing to him as a negative act
這樣你們就不需要經歷那時的人們對他做的負面行為，而產生的負面結果
He forgave you all for all time.
他永遠地寬恕了你們所有人
Do you understand?
你明白了嗎？
問：
Yes
是的
巴夏：
That has a profound affect of allowing you to be free to forgive yourselves and others and come back into alignment.
這對於你們能夠自由地寬恕自己和他人，並且回到與真我一致的狀態，具有深遠的影響
This is where we began our understanding and practice of neutrality for any kind of consequence of a choice that might have been negative in our ancient past
這也是我們理解和練習“中立”的開始之時（耶穌之死），並消除我們族人在過往中的負面選擇所產生的任何一種結果
2020年4月12日
【看見負面】
 |
| 寶石圖來源：pngtree.com |
因為你本來就是高頻率存有
所以很多時候所謂的清理與療癒
都只是單純覺察到那些不屬於你的負面信念
藉由覺察到它們而釋放掉
如此而已
每次釋放，都只會更接近真實的頻率
所以看見「負面」，其實是好的事情
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)
可能喜歡
-
所有的事物都是如此 除非你能意識到它們 否則它們就沒有生命 就像這根枝枒 如果葡萄樹的汁液不再流向它 它會枯萎、死亡 你世界中的事物也是如此 如果你把注意力從它們身上移開 它們就會消逝 因為你的注意力就是支撐那些事物得以存活的生命汁液 要解決眼前一個對你來說看似非常真實的問題...
-
很多時候真正出問題的 並非是我們的問題 而是我們對待問題的方式 我們對於出狀況的情形避之唯恐不及 將遇到的事情視為是錯誤糟糕 刻意避開掩蓋逃亡 因為不去了解反而更加恐慌 這種時候可以改變做法 平靜下來 別急著正確 別急著改善 別試著修好它 去傾聽就好 傾聽幾乎就足夠了 真正的... -
相信自己沒有能力創造出自己想要的一切 不是最核心的負面信念 因為只要這世界上有人做到 如果你夠誠實，其實你知道你有能力做到 而且有個不證自明的證據就是 如果你有能力體驗到你不喜歡的實相 你也等於證明你有能力體驗你喜歡的實相 這是同樣相等的能力 所以問題不在...
